ICOMOS

ICOMOS Lebanon urgent alert on Beaufort Castle calling for action, dated 31 July 2026.

ICOMOS Lebanon urgent alert on Beaufort Castle calling for action

ICOMOS Lebanon Alert on Beaufort July 31, 2026 ICOMOS Lebanon Source I. The Facts on the Ground On the night of 30 to 31 July 2026, the Israeli military detonated approximately 700 tonnes of explosives beneath the ShaKif Ridge, in the immediate vicinity of Beaufort Castle (Qalaat al-Chakif), a component of the Jabal Amel serial property. ICOMOS Lebanon states plainly what this means in heritage terms: a detonation of this scale, directly beneath the ridge on which a 12th-century Crusader fortress stands, cannot be assumed to leave that fortress unaffected. Structures of this age and construction are acutely vulnerable to ground shock, vibration, and subsurface displacement. Given the close proximity of the claimed tunnel network to the castle, no responsible assessment of this operation can proceed on the assumption that a 700-tonne detonation at such proximity leaves the standing structure above it undisturbed. ICOMOS Lebanon calls for an immediate, independent, on-site technical assessment of the structural condition of Beaufort Castle, and reiterates that the absence of a fully documented assessment does not mean the absence of damage — it means the damage has not yet been measured. This detonation is not a surprise development. It follows months of documented, unconfirmed-but-unrefuted reporting that a demolition of this kind was pending political approval. It follows the explicit public warning issued by Lebanon’s Minister of Culture, Ghassan Salamé, who told UNESCO’s Director-General in a letter dated 5 June 2026 that Beaufort Castle was under direct threat of demolition following its capture by Israeli forces on 31 May. And it follows, by a matter of days, one of the most significant acts of international heritage protection in this conflict to date: the inscription, on an emergency basis under Article 11(4) of the 1972 World Heritage Convention, of Beaufort Castle and four other fortresses of the Jabal Amel serial property onto both the World Heritage List and the List of World Heritage in Danger, adopted by the UNESCO World Heritage Committee at its 48th session in Busan on 22–24 July 2026. Eight days after the international community placed Beaufort Castle under its highest level of documented concern, 700 tonnes of explosives were detonated in its direct vicinity and its geological substratum. II. The Applicable Legal Framework ICOMOS Lebanon sets out, with precision, the legal obligations engaged by this act — including Israel’s own specific treaty commitments, which this statement states accurately rather than by inference: Israel acceded to the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention on 6 October 1999, and is fully bound by Article 6(3): States Parties ‘undertake not to take any deliberate measures which might damage directly or indirectly’ World Heritage on the territory of other States Parties. Beaufort Castle was inscribed as World Heritage precisely eight days before this detonation. Israel is a State Party to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and to its First Protocol. Article 4 of the Convention obliges parties to refrain from any act of hostility directed against cultural property and from any use of such property or its immediate surroundings that is likely to expose it to destruction or damage. ICOMOS Lebanon notes, for the sake of legal precision, that Israel has not acceded to the 1999 Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention, which establishes the specific Enhanced Protection regime and its associated individual criminal responsibility provisions under Article 15. This does not diminish Israel’s obligations under the core 1954 Convention, to which it remains fully bound; it does mean that the Enhanced Protection status UNESCO has conferred on Beaufort Castle carries the full weight of international institutional recognition and concern, even though its specific treaty enforcement mechanism does not extend, by treaty, to a State that has chosen not to accede to it. ICOMOS Lebanon considers this gap itself worthy of international attention: a state conducting large-scale military operations in immediate proximity to a listed World Heritage property should not be permitted to treat a non-accession to one protocol as license to disregard the substance of the protection regime as a whole. UN Security Council Resolution 2347 (2017), binding on all UN member states including Israel, determines that the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage in armed conflict constitutes a threat to international peace and security under Article 39 of the UN Charter. The customary international humanitarian law obligation to take all feasible precautions to avoid, and in any event to minimize, incidental damage to civilian objects — including cultural property — applies regardless of specific treaty accession, and is considered binding on all parties to an armed conflict. Whatever justification is offered for the underlying military objective, the choice of method — a 700-tonne detonation directly beneath an inscribed World Heritage property, days after its inscription, when smaller and more precise alternatives were reportedly available and had already been used at the same site on 13 July — raises a serious question of proportionality and precaution that international law requires be answered, not assumed away. III. From Statements to Action ICOMOS Lebanon has, over the past two months, issued a continuous and escalating record of alerts on precisely this risk. Our Emergency Statement of 27 May 2026 named Beaufort Castle explicitly among the sites under direct threat. Our Alert Statement of 7 June 2026, following the strike on the entrance and administration buildings of the Tyre World Heritage Site, restated the same warning. ICOMOS Lebanon and UNESCO jointly condemned strikes on Beaufort in a statement of 8 June 2026, which recalled that ‘cultural property, particularly when under Enhanced Protection, must not be made the object of attack or used for military purposes.’ Minister Salamé wrote to UNESCO’s Director-General on 5 June 2026 with the same warning. The World Heritage Committee itself, in inscribing Beaufort Castle onto the Danger List only days ago, formally recognized that the site faced ‘ongoing threats from the conflict, serious enough to justify resorting to an emergency procedure.’ Every, and each one of these warnings has now been borne out.

ICOMOS Lebanon urgent alert on Beaufort Castle calling for action Read More »

Ancient stone wall of Chamaa citadel with Blue Shield protection sign in the foreground

A Protected Site, Unprotected Reality: The Attack on Chamaa

A Protected Site, An Unprotected Reality: The Attack on the Citadel of Chamaa April 13, 2026 ICOMOS Lebanon Source Armed Conflict, Blue Shield, Enhanced Protection, Hague Convention 1954 In the wake of escalating hostilities and repeated attacks on cultural heritage across Lebanon, ICOMOS Lebanon expresses its deep concern and unequivocal condemnation following the severe targeting of the historic site of Chamaa and the village enclosed within the walls of its ancient citadel. A Site Under Enhanced Protection Chamaa is not an ordinary site. It is recognized for its outstanding cultural significance and is inscribed on the Enhanced Protection List under the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property. This designation represents the highest level of international legal protection granted to cultural heritage in times of armed conflict. As outlined in the 2026 ICOMOS Lebanon coverage of the Fifth Extraordinary Meeting, Lebanon secured enhanced protection status for 39 of its most vulnerable cultural sites in addition to the 34 previously listed sites following escalating threats in 2024. This recognition was not symbolic; it imposed binding obligations on all parties to refrain from targeting, damaging, or using these sites for military purposes. Among these, the Citadel of Chamaa holds exceptional cultural and religious importance. It is not merely an architectural landmark, but a place where Christian and Islamic traditions intersect. Revered across faiths, the site reflects centuries of coexistence and spiritual continuity in southern Lebanon. Historical and religious sources converge on the elevated status of Simon Cephas, known in Arabic as Shamaoun al-Safa, one of the foremost disciples of Jesus Christ and bearer of the title “Rock of the Church.” According to local traditions, the citadel represents, for Christians, a sacred link to Saint Peter, regarded as the founder of the Apostolic See and a missionary in the Levant. For Muslims, it is tied to the legacy of Prophet ʿĪsā (Jesus) and his entrusted disciple, revered as a guardian of divine knowledge and often honored among the prophets or righteous saints who paved the way for later revelations. The Citadel of Chamaa was never merely a religious shrine; it stood as a symbol of coexistence. Within its walls, Islamic and Christian narratives met under one roof, making it a living model of southern Lebanon’s diverse and open identity. A Repeatedly Damaged Heritage Landscape The attack on Chamaa is not an isolated incident. The site has already suffered damage in previous conflicts and has undergone extensive restoration efforts over the years. Its destruction today represents the erasure of layers of history that communities have worked tirelessly to preserve. Beyond its architectural and archaeological value, Chamaa is a living heritage site, a village embedded within its historic fabric, where memory, identity, and daily life intersect. The targeting of such a site is therefore not only a violation of international law, but a direct assault on the cultural continuity and dignity of its people. For further context on Lebanon’s cultural assets at risk, refer to the ICOMOS Lebanon heritage sites overview, which details those granted enhanced protection status, including the Chamaa Citadel, officially added to the list in 2024. A Breakdown of Protection Mechanisms This attack highlights a deeply concerning reality: even the highest levels of international protection are failing to prevent the destruction of cultural heritage in active conflict zones. Despite multiple statements and alerts issued by UNESCO and ICOMOS International, and despite the legal frameworks established under international conventions, violations continue with alarming frequency. This raises critical questions about enforcement, accountability, and the effectiveness of existing protection mechanisms in contemporary warfare contexts. Call to Action In light of these developments, ICOMOS Lebanon calls upon: The international community Relevant United Nations bodies Cultural and heritage institutions to take immediate and concrete action: Uphold and enforce international conventions protecting cultural heritage Strengthen monitoring and response mechanisms in conflict zones Ensure accountability for violations of international cultural protection frameworks Heritage Protection as a Foundation for Peace Protecting cultural heritage is not a secondary concern in times of war. It is inseparable from the protection of human life, dignity, and identity. The destruction of heritage is often a precursor – or a companion – to the destruction of communities themselves. Safeguarding sites like Chamaa is therefore not only about preserving the past, but about defending the foundations of peace, resilience, and collective memory. Video Evidence of the Attack, trending on 𝕏 https://lebanon.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Historic-site-of-Chamaa-Ancient-Citadel-Video.mp4

A Protected Site, Unprotected Reality: The Attack on Chamaa Read More »

The five Castles of Mount Amel

Tentitive Sites The five Castles of Mount Amel Across the hills of Mount Amel, a chain of fortresses stands as a testament to centuries of strategic control, conflict, and architectural evolution. Historical Significance The Five Castles of Mount Amel form a coherent defensive network reflecting the military, political, and architectural dynamics of southern Lebanon from antiquity through the medieval period. Primarily developed during the Crusader era and subsequently adapted by Ayyubid, Mamluk, and later powers, these fortresses illustrate the exchange of defensive techniques and the evolution of fortified architecture. Positioned along strategic ridges and routes, they collectively demonstrate how control over territory was asserted and maintained across centuries in a region of sustained geopolitical importance. About the Serial Property Located across South Lebanon, the five castles occupy elevated and strategic positions overlooking key valleys, trade routes, and agricultural landscapes. Though each site has its own distinct history and condition, together they form an interconnected system of fortifications that reflect both regional defense strategies and local adaptations to terrain. Their distribution across Mount Amel highlights the importance of topography in medieval military planning and territorial control. Components of the Property Qalaat al-Chakif (Beaufort Castle): Built in the 12th century around 1137, this fortress dominates the Litani River valley from a strategic ridge. It is one of the best-preserved medieval castles in the Near East and was expanded by Ayyubid, Mamluk, and later rulers. Qalaat Tibnin (Toron Castle): An early 12th-century Crusader stronghold situated on a hilltop, preserving archaeological layers dating back to the Bronze Age. Its successive modifications reflect continuous adaptation of defensive architecture. Qalaat Chakra (Dubieh Castle): Located along a southern Lebanese ridge, this Crusader-era fortress overlooks a landscape of agricultural terraces. Despite partial ruin, it retains clear structural features and defensive planning. Qalaat Deir Kifa (Maron Castle): Positioned on elevated terrain, this former Crusader military post was later reused by regional powers. It preserves layered remains demonstrating prolonged occupation and strategic reuse. Qalaat Chama’: Situated near the Mediterranean coast, this hilltop fortress dates back at least to the Roman period and was reinforced during the Crusader era. It remains a symbol of continuous historical use despite modern conflicts. Cultural and Strategic Context Together, these castles represent more than isolated monuments—they form a broader cultural and military landscape shaped by conflict, adaptation, and continuity. Their enduring presence reflects the strategic importance of Mount Amel as a frontier zone, where successive powers left their mark on both the architecture and the territory. As a group, they illustrate the transmission of military knowledge and the lasting imprint of fortified systems in the eastern Mediterranean. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

The five Castles of Mount Amel Read More »

Ras Al-Qalaat, Al-Natour, and El-Mlelih Promontories

Tentitive Sites Ras Al-Qalaat, Al-Natour, and El-Mlelih Promontories At Anfeh, the coastline is not only shaped by nature, but by centuries of human ingenuity, carving livelihoods directly into the rock. Historical Significance The promontories of Ras Al-Qalaat, Al-Natour, and El-Mlelih form an exceptional coastal cultural landscape that reflects continuous human interaction with the Mediterranean environment over millennia. Evidence of occupation extends back to the Chalcolithic period, with successive Phoenician, Byzantine, and Crusader influences shaping the site. The area is particularly notable for its rock-carved salt pans—among the oldest in the Mediterranean—which demonstrate the long-standing development and transmission of maritime production techniques. Archaeological remains, including wine presses, religious structures, and fortified elements, further illustrate the diversity of activities that defined the site across time. About the Site Located in northern Lebanon in the region of Anfeh and its extension Hraishi, the site is composed of three interconnected promontories: Ras al-Mlelih, Ras al-Qalaat, and Deir al-Natour. Each area contributes distinct features, from archaeological remains and medieval fortifications to extensive salt marshes carved directly into the coastal rock. Deir al-Natour, in particular, hosts the largest concentration of salt pans in Lebanon, surrounding a Crusader-era monastery built upon earlier Byzantine foundations. The physical layout of the site highlights a close relationship between land, sea, and human activity. Cultural and Environmental Interaction This landscape represents a rare example of sustained adaptation to a coastal environment, where natural resources were harnessed through innovative techniques that have endured across generations. Salt production, maritime trade, and religious practices coexisted within a single setting, creating a dynamic and multifunctional space. Today, the site remains a powerful testimony to the resilience and ingenuity of coastal communities, illustrating how cultural traditions can be deeply rooted in and shaped by the natural environment. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

Ras Al-Qalaat, Al-Natour, and El-Mlelih Promontories Read More »

Sacred Mount Hermon and its Associated Cultural Monuments

Tentitive Sites Sacred Mount Hermon and its Associated Cultural Monuments Rising above the region, Mount Hermon has long been a place where earth and sky converge, shaping one of the most enduring sacred landscapes of the Near East. Historical Significance Sacred Mount Hermon has been revered since the Bronze Age, holding a central place in the spiritual and cultural traditions of the Near East. Referenced in ancient texts and associated with key biblical narratives, the mountain has attracted successive civilizations, including Canaanite, Roman, Christian, Islamic, and Druze communities. The presence of over thirty temples and shrines, many situated at high altitudes, reflects a long-standing tradition of ritual practice and pilgrimage. These remains illustrate not only continuity of worship but also the exchange and adaptation of religious beliefs across cultures and time. About the Site Located in southern Lebanon along the Syrian border, Mount Hermon rises to 2,814 meters, dominating the surrounding landscape. Its archaeological remains are dispersed across its slopes and summits, with notable sites such as the sanctuary of Qasr Antar marking some of the highest places of worship in the region. The positioning of these structures highlights the symbolic importance of elevation, where proximity to the sky reinforced the mountain’s sacred character. Spiritual and Cultural Landscape Mount Hermon is best understood as an evolving cultural landscape rather than a single archaeological site. Its significance lies in the continuous layering of spiritual meanings attributed to it by different communities over millennia. The coexistence of diverse religious traditions, all connected to the same natural landmark, underscores its role as a shared sacred space. This enduring spiritual relevance, combined with its dramatic natural setting, makes Mount Hermon a powerful testament to the intersection of nature, belief, and cultural identity. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

Sacred Mount Hermon and its Associated Cultural Monuments Read More »

The Historic Centre of the City of Batroun

Tentitive Sites The Historic Centre of the City of Batroun In Batroun, the city and the sea are inseparable, shaping a coastal landscape where history has been carved directly into stone. Historical Significance The Historic Centre of Batroun reflects a long and continuous history of occupation dating back to the Early Bronze Age. Successive civilizations—including Phoenician, Roman, Byzantine, Crusader, Mamluk, and Ottoman—have contributed to its layered urban and architectural identity. Among its most distinctive features is the Phoenician sea wall, carved directly into the coastal rock, alongside remains of Roman, Crusader, and later structures. This accumulation of heritage illustrates the evolution of a Mediterranean coastal settlement shaped by trade, defense, and maritime activity. About the Site Located approximately 54 km north of Beirut, Batroun sits on a rocky promontory overlooking the Mediterranean. Its historic centre is characterized by a compact urban layout with narrow streets, traditional souks, and sandstone-built houses that reflect its Ottoman-era fabric. Key elements include the unfinished Roman theatre, Crusader fortifications, and remnants of ancient port installations. The spatial organization of the city reveals its defensive origins while maintaining a strong connection to the sea. Cultural and Contemporary Relevance Batroun’s identity is deeply rooted in its relationship with the Mediterranean. Maritime traditions, including fishing and historical sponge harvesting, have played a central role in shaping both its economy and cultural practices. The enduring use of coastal resources, combined with the preservation of historic urban forms, makes Batroun a compelling example of continuity in coastal land use and community life across millennia. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

The Historic Centre of the City of Batroun Read More »

Temple of Eshmun

Tentitive Sites Temple of Eshmun At Eshmun, water, architecture, and belief converge to form one of the most enduring sacred landscapes of the ancient Mediterranean. Historical Significance The Temple of Eshmun is one of the most important Phoenician religious complexes in the Levant, dedicated to Eshmun, the god of healing. Established in the late 7th century BC, the sanctuary evolved continuously over nearly a millennium, reflecting successive cultural influences from Phoenician, Persian, Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine periods. Its architectural layers—including monumental podiums, decorated temples, and later religious structures—illustrate the transformation of sacred space across civilizations while preserving its original spiritual function as a center of healing and pilgrimage. About the Site Located near Sidon on the southern bank of the Awali River at Bqosta, the sanctuary extends across approximately 3.6 hectares within a naturally rich setting. The complex includes a sequence of terraces, ritual basins, sacred pools, and processional pathways, all closely integrated with water sources that were central to its healing rituals. Sculpted friezes, architectural remains, and the later addition of a Byzantine church highlight the site’s architectural richness and its continued importance across different periods. Spiritual and Cultural Context The significance of Eshmun lies in its role as a healing sanctuary where water, ritual, and belief were inseparable. The integration of natural springs into the sacred architecture reflects ancient conceptions of purification and renewal, attracting worshippers over centuries. Its long continuity of use demonstrates how sacred traditions were adapted rather than replaced, making it a powerful example of spiritual resilience and cultural transformation within a single site. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

Temple of Eshmun Read More »

Ensemble of Historical Monuments and Natural Sites of the Village of Menjez

Tentitive Sites Ensemble of Historical Monuments and Natural Sites of the Village of Menjez In Menjez, the dialogue between stone and landscape reveals a continuity of human presence stretching from prehistory to the modern day. Historical Significance The Ensemble of Historical Monuments and Natural Sites of the Village of Menjez represents a rare convergence of prehistoric, classical, and later cultural layers within a single preserved landscape. Its most significant feature is the largest known megalithic necropolis in Lebanon, dating to the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age (4th–3rd millennia BC), composed of numerous basalt dolmen tombs that testify to early funerary traditions in the region. The site also includes a basalt-built temple, possibly Hellenistic and linked to the cult of Nemesis, alongside Roman hydraulic systems and Crusader remains. Together, these elements illustrate a long and continuous pattern of human occupation and adaptation. About the Site Located in Akkar, along the banks of the Nahr el-Kabir near the Syrian border, Menjez is distinguished by its unique use of basalt as a primary construction material. The archaeological remains are dispersed across a natural landscape that includes forested areas and open terrain, creating a strong visual and functional relationship between built heritage and environment. The village itself preserves a coherent 19th-century architectural fabric, also constructed in basalt, reflecting continuity in local building traditions. Cultural and Environmental Relevance Menjez stands out not only for its archaeological richness but also for its integration within a biodiverse natural setting. The surrounding forests, home to endemic Mediterranean species, enhance the site’s value as a cultural landscape where human activity has coexisted with and adapted to the natural environment over millennia. This interplay between nature and heritage reinforces its significance as a place where ecological and cultural continuity are deeply interconnected. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

Ensemble of Historical Monuments and Natural Sites of the Village of Menjez Read More »

Archaeological Site of Nahr el-Kalb

Tentitive Sites Archaeological Site of Nahr el-Kalb At Nahr el-Kalb, history is not buried beneath the ground-it is carved into the landscape itself, layer after layer, empire after empire. Historical Significance The Archaeological Site of Nahr el-Kalb stands as one of the most remarkable commemorative landscapes in the Near East, documenting over three millennia of political and military history. Since the 13th century BC, conquering powers have marked this strategic coastal passage with inscriptions and reliefs, beginning with the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses II. The site preserves an exceptional sequence of 22 stelae and inscriptions from successive civilizations, including Assyrian, Neo-Babylonian, Greek, Roman, Mamluk, Ottoman, and modern periods. Written in multiple scripts-hieroglyphic, cuneiform, Greek, Latin, Arabic, and more-it forms a unique epigraphic archive reflecting the continuity of historical memory in the region. About the Site Located approximately 15 km north of Beirut, the site occupies a narrow coastal corridor where the mountains meet the Mediterranean, historically serving as a key transit route linking north and south. The inscriptions are carved directly into the limestone cliffs overlooking the passage, creating a striking visual record of successive dominations. Each monument was deliberately placed to assert control over this strategic route, transforming the landscape into a symbolic gateway marked by power and presence. Cultural and Contemporary Relevance Nahr el-Kalb remains a powerful symbol of Lebanon’s role as a crossroads of civilizations. Unlike traditional archaeological sites, its significance lies in the accumulation of historical narratives rather than a single period of occupation. The continued addition of modern commemorative inscriptions highlights its enduring function as a site of memory, where past and present intersect. It stands today not only as a record of conquest, but as a rare cultural space where history has been continuously inscribed rather than erased. Open User Map This block will show your Locations on a map in the front end. Custom Map Position (optional): Latitude Longitude Zoom Filter Locations (optional): Filter by Marker Categories [PRO] Filter by POST IDs Witness damage or threat to this site? Report it immediately. Report Damage Report

Archaeological Site of Nahr el-Kalb Read More »